Blog

Using CO₂ for alkalinity control in cooling towers is effective, and in many cases, cost-competitive with acid feed (especially sulfuric).

1. How CO₂ Works in Cooling Towers
2. CO₂ dissolves in water to form carbonic acid:
3. CO₂ + H₂O → H₂CO₃ → H⁺ + HCO₃⁻
4. This mild acid lowers pH and consumes alkalinity, similar to sulfuric acid, but with softer chemistry.
   1. You’re essentially rebalancing the carbonate system rather than adding strong mineral acids.
5. Effectiveness

1. 1. Lowers pH effectively to the target range (usually 8.2–8.5)
   2. Reduces M-alkalinity over time by shifting carbonate equilibrium
   3. Reduces scale formation: Less carbonate = less CaCO₃ scaling
   4. Non-corrosive feed: Unlike sulfuric acid, CO₂ gas won’t cause localized corrosion or acid burns
   5. Self-buffering: Much harder to overshoot pH, making it safer

1. Especially useful where alkalinity and calcium are both high, and you need to reduce scaling risk without over-acidifying.

6. Cost Effectiveness

Typical Cost Comparison (US, 2024–2025 ballpark)

1. Sulfuric acid is 50% to 66% less expensive than H2SO4 strictly on a chemical cost basis.
   1. But CO₂ is much safer, reduces corrosion risk, and provides gentler, self-buffering pH control.
   2. CO₂ becomes competitive:

1. Where safety is a top concern
2. In sensitive systems (e.g., stainless or aluminum components)

• If operational downtime or acid handling costs are significant

8. Efficiency Considerations

1. 1. CO₂ has lower acid strength per pound, so:
   2. You need more CO₂ by weight to neutralize the same amount of alkalinity
   3. But you reduce risks, corrosion, and handling costs
   4. Savings in safety, maintenance, and corrosion protection can offset higher volume requirements

9. System Requirements

1. 1. CO₂ storage tank (bulk or cylinders)
   2. Gas flow control and injection system
   3. Often integrated with pH automation

1. Initial capex is higher than sulfuric, but long-term OPEX + safety + maintenance costs can be better.

10. When CO₂ is Most Cost-Effective

1. 1. High cycles → high pH/alkalinity → more acid demand
   2. Sites with strict safety regulations or acid-handling restrictions
   3. Systems prone to acid overdosing or corrosion
   4. Facilities with onsite CO₂ generation (e.g., breweries, food plants)

11. CO₂ vs. Sulfuric Acid — Quick Comparison

1. CO₂ is very effective at reducing alkalinity and controlling pH gently
2. Cost-effective in systems with:
   1. High cycles
   2. High alkalinity
   3. Safety or corrosion concerns
3. Not always cheapest up front, but safer and often cheaper long term
4. Best suited for systems where precision and non-corrosiveness matter

16. Example Based on PHX 15 Make Up Water

22. Let’s assume your goal is to:

1. Reduce M-alkalinity in tower water from ~780 ppm (5× makeup) to ~500 ppm
2. Lower pH from ~8.5 to ~8.2

25.  
26.  
27. Chemical Demand Calculations
    1. CO₂
       1. 1 ppm alkalinity (CaCO₃) needs ≈ 0.88 ppm CO₂
    2. Sulfuric Acid (H₂SO₄, 92%)
       1. 1 ppm alkalinity (CaCO₃) ≈ 0.49 ppm 92% H₂SO₄